The Lobster That Tried to Be Claude: What OpenClaw’s Identity Crisis Teaches Us About the AI Platform War
In a whirlwind 72 hours, Peter Steinberger’s AI project, originally named Clawdbot, faced legal pressure, crypto scams, and a branding struggle. After being told to rename due to trademark issues with “Claude,” Steinberger opted for “Moltbot,” which quickly fell flat. The final name, “OpenClaw,” reflects an insightful journey through the tumultuous landscape of AI platform dependencies.
“The naming drama was just the surface. What happened next revealed something far more important.”
The narrative reveals how quickly platforms can change rules—a warning for developers who build on others’ technologies. Important takeaways include:
- Building on platforms can lead to sudden restrictions, impacting workflows.
- AI systems can offer an illusion of sovereignty while relying on external intelligence.
- Understanding the potential risks associated with third-party dependencies is crucial.
As Steinberger’s project transitioned to OpenClaw, it emphasized the need for a multi-model strategy. In this rapidly evolving landscape, developers must be ready for change and equipped with fallback plans. The real question remains: What’s your strategy for navigating platform dependencies? Explore the full article for deeper insights into this compelling saga.
Read the full story for more details:
Continue reading
